[downloads](http://cranlogs.r-pkg.org:443/badges/Rlibeemd
An R interface for libeemd C library for ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD) and its complete variant (CEEMDAN). These methods decompose possibly nonlinear and/or nonstationary time series data into a finite amount of components (called IMFs, insintric mode functions) separated by instantaneous frequencies. This decomposition provides a powerful method to look into the different processes behind a given time series, and provides a way to separate short time-scale events from a general trend.
If you use Rlibeemd/libeemd for scientific work please cite Luukko, P.J.J.,
Helske, J., Räsänen, E., Comput. Stat. 31, 545
(2016) (also on
arXiv). This article also describes in detail what
libeemd
actually computes. You should definitely read it if
you are unsure about what EMD, EEMD and CEEMDAN are.
Current CRAN policies do not allow the use of
SHLIB_OPENMP_CFLAGS
combined with linking with C++.
Therefore the CRAN version does not use OpenMP at all anymore (OpenMP
flags have been removed from Makevars
), but the the version
on GitHub version does. So if you want to use parallel version of the
Rlibeemd
, please install the package via
install.packages('Rlibeemd', repos = 'https://helske.r-universe.dev')
Here a CEEMDAN decomposition is performed for the UK gas consumption
series (length n = 108). By default, ceemdan
extracts
[log_2(n)] components, so here we get five IMFs and the residual.
{r, fig.height = 4, fig.width = 8} library("Rlibeemd") data(UKgas, package = "datasets") imfs <- ceemdan(UKgas, ensemble_size = 1000) plot(imfs, main = "Five IMFs and residual extracted by CEEMDAN algorithm")
The residual components shows smooth trend whereas the first IMF contains clear multiplicative trend. The remaining IMFs are bit more complex, and one could argue that they are partly seasonal, trend or just some irregularity i.e. noise.
Let us compare the decomposition with basic structural time series
model fit from StructTS
(for smoothing of more complex
state space models, one could use KFAS)
{r, fig.height = 4, fig.width = 8} bsm <- tsSmooth(StructTS(UKgas)) plot(bsm[, c(1, 3)], main = "Local linear trend and seasonal components by StructTS")
StructTS
decomposes the data for three components, where
one of the components is (possibly time varying) slope, which has no
direct effect to overall signal (it is the slope of the level
component).
{r, fig.height=4, fig.width=8} ts.plot(cbind(UKgas, imfs[, ncol(imfs)], rowSums(imfs[, 5:6]), bsm[,"level"]), col = 1:4, main = "Quarterly UK gas consumption", ylab = "Million therms") legend("topleft", c("Observations", "Residual", "Last IMF + residual", "Trend from BSM"), col = 1:4, lty = 1)
The IMF_5 + residual is quite close to the trend obtained by
structural time series model of StructTS
.